Skip to main content
Advantive

G-Chart: Rare Event Control Chart

A free online reference for statistical process control, process capability analysis, measurement systems analysis,
control chart interpretation, and other quality metrics.

SPC DEMO

Minimize Production Costs, Quickly Detect Issues, and Optimize Your Product Quality

Don’t miss out! Book a demo of our specialized SPC software and unlock immediate improvements in your processes.

Book a Demo

g-chart

What is it?

A g-chart is a chart for attributes data. It is used to count the number of events between rarely-occurring errors or nonconforming incidents.

The g-chart creates a picture of a process over time. Each point represents the number of units between occurrences of a relatively rare event. For example, in a production setting, where cars are produced daily, an unexpected line shutdown may occur. A g-chart might be used to look at the number of units (i.e. cars) produced between line shutdowns. The units produced can be almost anything. For example, you might look at the number of invoices printed, the number of customers served, or the number of patients seen, between occurrences of some event. A traditional plot of data such as this is not conducive to control chart interpretation. The g-chart helps to visualize this data in traditional control chart form. Specific formulas for g-chart control limits are used with this type of data.

The “g” in g-chart stands for geometric, since data relating to events between occurrences represents a geometric distribution. G-charts can be created using software programs like SQCpack.

What does it look like?

When is it used?

A rare event chart is used when a traditional control chart is not effective. Consider a rare event chart when one or more of these conditions exist:

  1. More than 20% of the data being counted has a numerator of zero.
  2. The denominator of a typical count-based control chart is so large that the control limits are excessively close to the average.
  3. The LCL (lower control limit) is missing.

Why is a t-chart used?

  • To see if the process is stable and predictable
  • To see how a planned change affects the process
  • To track the passage of time between relatively rare events

Why is a g-chart used?

  • To see if the process is stable and predictable
  • To see how a planned change affects the process
  • To track the number of units counted between relatively rare events

Getting the most

Here are some processes in various industries that lend themselves to rare event application.

Healthcare

  • Wrong-site surgeries
  • Patient falls
  • Infection outbreaks
  • Accidental needle sticks
  • Harmful medication errors

Manufacturing

  • Product liability lawsuits over 1 million dollars
  • Accidental deaths or dismemberments
  • Production line stoppages
  • Days since last accident

Service

  • Power outages over 1 minute
  • Bank statement errors

Education

  • School closings
  • Days between a student’s absences

Additional reference material

Additional sections from legacy g-chart-f:

g-chart formula

The g-chart formula:

Reviewed by

Quality & SPC review panel

Articles on statistical process control, capability indices, control charts, and quality management are reviewed by the product teams behind InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems (SQCpack and GAGEpack) — the SPC and quality platforms deployed across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

Customers using Advantive in quality advisor

“Enact helps us quickly respond to quality issues, which saves us money.”
Jegadish Gunasagaran Quality Assurance Manager, Bakery on Main
““What sets Ben & Jerry’s apart from our competitors is not only our insistence on high-quality ingredients, but also the extra and unique flavours we use to create a euphoric customer experience. Ensuring the final product reflects the passion and quality that we put into each pint required a quality solution that emphasized the same attention to details that we do.””
Melissa Corcia, Quality Manager, Ben & Jerry’s
““By utilizing InfinityQS® ProFicient™ to implement SPC and Six Sigma best practices across our manufacturing processes, Ben & Jerry’s will continue to identify opportunities for cost savings and ensure the highest level of customer satisfaction. The result is the perfect pint for our customers.””
Nina King, Quality Supervisor, Ben & Jerry’s

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.