Skip to main content
Advantive

Why Is Standardization Important? The Benefits of Standardization in Manufacturing

By Grace Barton Updated
Why Is Standardization Important? The Benefits of Standardization in Manufacturing

Standardization. Is that a dirty word to you? Is that something you consider “unattainable,” and therefore not worth discussing? Is standardization the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow? What is it? Why is standardization important for manufacturers? And what are the benefits of standardization for your organization? Let’s discuss.

In general, the role of standardization in manufacturing is almost always positive. But maintaining manufacturing standardization can be difficult.

I’m here to tell you that standardization in manufacturing isa good thing. And worth the effort. Manufacturers discovered long ago that standardizing the way your organization operates leads to increased profitability and cuts down on all sorts of problems.

So, I started thinking of the importance of standardization in what we do here at InfinityQS with our customers.

The Benefits of Standardization in Manufacturing

The advantages of standardization are many. These are the top of the charts for me:

  • Deployment a Breeze – a standardized system is faster to deploy. When everything is standardized (naming conventions, software, etc.), your deployment becomes (sort of) lather, rinse, repeat.
     
  • Maintenance to Dream About – a standardized system is much easier to maintain. When your system is standardized, you make a modification once and it applies to other processes, or data collections, or whatever.
     
  • Hubble-like Visibility – a standardized system in manufacturing gives you visibility across sites to make the kind of comparisons you otherwise would not be able to make. The Hubble space telescope could see unimaginably far into space. With standardization across your enterprise, you can see across that enterprise. And that’s priceless.
     
  • Cloud Power – a standardized system in the cloud is much less costly. No servers to stand up, maintain, or protect; a single, unified data repository (which alone is worth the work of standardization); and easy access for users from all types of devices.

What Does “Standardization” Mean?

Why is standardization important in manufacturing? It’s essential in any system,
and is especially important to an enterprise platform like InfinityQS software. And the term has a few meanings (which I alluded to earlier), depending upon your focus:

  • Naming conventions—making sure parts, features, processes, and more are named the same in every department or shift. Standardizing your naming conventions saves a lot of troubles down the road. It’s great when everyone has a common language to use when referring to the myriad components involved in your manufacturing operations. This saves time and eliminates confusion.
     
  • Standardization also means making sure that all facilities are using the same system, be it InfinityQS ProFicient™ or Enact®. Standardizing software products makes sense for many reasons, not the least of which is collaboration: since everyone has the same tools and capabilities, teams can freely share information. When shop floor operators learn something new about the software, they can share it with others. And your IT staff will thank you: purchasing and maintaining a single system reduces their burden. It’s a headache they don’t want…or need.
  • Within the software, standardization means making sure everyone is using the same functionalities in the same way. Making sure that aspects of the software are used in the same way guarantees that you’re all speaking the same “language.” This cuts down on confusion and inefficiency.
     
  • Looking at the results of measurements in the same way is critical. Measurements are expected to give reliable results. If the ways in which the various parts of your organization view measurement results differ at all, then the decisions you make and your plans moving forward—solving issues, planning changes, allocating resources, etc.—are compromised, and made more complicated and difficult.

A lot goes into standardization in manufacturing—and there are a lot of ways to look at it and implement it within your organization. How do you talk about process performance? Do you use Pp/Ppk? Yield? Percent out of specification? Often, we hear things like, “Well, we do it this way here in the main facility, but our other site does it another way.”

This is often a by-product of things like software acquisition, previous quality issues, or employee turnover, wherein the previous regime purchased a system or did things one way and the new regime purchased something completely different and does things in a new, different way. The opportunities for mismatching—as you can imagine—are endless. Standardizing how you talk about performance means everyone is on a level playing field, which is important for buy-in at all levels. Everyone understands the benefits of data-driven decisions; everyone also wants those decisions to be made fairly.

Your Internal Differences Matter, But Don’t Let Them Thwart Standardization

Often, when we are deploying our software, we learn that two entities within an organization collect data in different ways. Perhaps a quality lab has a specific piece of laboratory equipment, and it spits out a particular piece of information; while in another setting, since they do not deal with the same laboratory equipment, it spits out slightly different information.

Or, perhaps the two labs use different methodologies, meaning one lab states that they have higher alkalinity in their water, so they require a different methodology for treating and measuring their products.

Or it can just come down to manpower. One lab states that their quality technicians are spread too thin. So, while another facility’s techs might do 12 checks, this lab does only eight of those checks, and the remaining four are performed by shop floor operators…so there’s this obvious division of labor.

You can see where this is going. We talk to the various groups at an organization, and they tell their disparate stories of how they conduct their daily affairs. Then they talk to each other as they try to decide on standards and discover just how differently they do things. And it’s a tough ball of yarn to untangle.

So, it’s helpful to know and understand the benefits of reaching consensus, of standardizing wherever and whenever you can. Then, when you run into these difficulties, you can see how important it is that you come to an understanding and standardize things within your organization.

And, believe me, the benefits of standardization in manufacturing far outweigh the temporary headaches.

So, there we have it. The benefits of standardization in manufacturing. A standardized system costs less, takes less time to deploy, gives you greater insight, and takes less to maintain and expand. The call to arms to stand firm and make it happen. In Part II of this short series, we’ll look at the challenges that organizations face when they try to standardize, and what can happen when they fail to standardize.

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.