Skip to main content
Advantive

The perennial question: which chart is best?

By Grace Barton Updated
The perennial question: which chart is best?

The perennial answer is, of course, “It depends.”

For decades of users, Shewhart control charts have provided information about process stability. Like all Shewhart charts, data is plotted over time and in order from oldest to most current. The traditional control chart, an old standby, is not the only possibility when it comes to garnering information from process data. In monitoring processes with small drifts or changes, for example, the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart may offer an improvement over traditional Shewhart control charts.

But again, that depends. Certain processes—for example, in the chemical industry—benefit from understanding small shifts or drifts in a process. For other industries, Shewhart control charts do the job quite effectively.

An EWMA chart is a revised form of a traditional control chart. There may be advantages and disadvantages to looking at your process data using an EWMA chart. Both EWMA and traditional Shewhart control charts are used for either variables or attributes data. The advantages lie in the application. Where it is important to track gradual shifts in a process or to compare to target values, EWMA may be an effective chart to use. If you are not familiar with an EWMA chart, it is similar to a Individuals or X-bar chart. However, each plotted point on the chart is comprised of a combination of the current measurement and a weighting factor from previous values. The concept is that the previous observations have some influence or weight on the current value. For example, if your measurement is 100, the EWMA chart may plot the observation less than 100 if previous values were less than 100. Since the previous values are lower, they “weigh” the current observed value lower.

While not everyone agrees with the use of EWMA charts, these charts offer some potential advantages. They:

  • may offer a quicker signal to detecting small changes than traditional Shewhart control charts;
  • are best at comparing data to target values, to understand when a process has drifted off target;
  • utilize upper and lower control limits to determine when a sample is out of control;
  • can be used with individual or subgrouped data.

Disadvantages:  EWMA charts:

  • may not be any better than Shewhart control charts at detecting out-of-control conditions for some processes;
  • may in fact be less effective in detecting out-of-control conditions;
  • are more complex and demand additional statistical understanding;
  • offer no advantage in analyzing certain processes (e.g., those with larger process shifts rather than subtle changes).
  • are difficult to create unless SPC software is used.

Complexity of the chart may represent the most dramatic hurdle to applying it to a process. But wait. You will not need to learn additional formulas or understand complex applications, since the complexity is all handled by SQCpack 7, which now offers the EWMA chart without creating more complexity for those who choose not to use it.

So while you ask yourself other questions about your data (attributes or variable? sample/subgroup size? etc.), consider the process that you are observing, the kind of data that it produces, and whether EWMA charts will offer additional information you are seeking.

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.