Skip to main content
Advantive

Quality at Any Cost? | Quality Insight

By Grace Barton Updated
Quality at Any Cost? | Quality Insight

In an ever-competitive global marketplace, it’s more important than ever to develop systematic means to measure and manage costs of quality, which reflect business improvement opportunities.

If there is a case being made for the importance of statistical process control software, A.V. Feigenbaum is making it.

Feigenbaum, a well-known expert and author in the field of total quality management, warned in an article in Quality Progress that if quality leaders don’t begin measuring and managing their companies’ quality costs, they risk being at the mercy of global market forces.

WinSPC Means Lower Costs and Higher Quality

WinSPC is software to help manufacturers create the highest quality product for the lowest possible cost. You can learn more here.

Not an easy chore to be sure, but the companies, particularly manufacturers, that control “business failure costs” will find the path to global expansion easier to trek.

“As many companies competing in today’s marketplace have discovered,” Feigenbaum writes in his article “Raising the Bar,” “quality costs can quickly snowball, leading to a substantial economic impact in all facets of their operations.”

A holder of doctorates in engineering and economics from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Feigenbaum says identifying business failure costs is the first step in bridging the internal  “disconnects” that prevent firms from being able to competitively market their products in the international marketplace.

Feigenbaum says the “structure” of business failure costs has four components:

  1. External Failure: Companies are eating these costs because products and services are not up to snuff in the marketplace and “unsatisfactory completion of business tasks required for delivering complete customer quality satisfaction.”
    Examples in manufacturing include: product service, liability, warranty and policy adjustments.
  2. Internal Failure: Same as external failure, except these costs are generated because the “company network” failed to recognize and react to market conditions. Examples in manufacturing include: scrap and rework; excess labor and materials; failure investigation and correction; product and process redesign; and downtime and delays.
  3. Appraisal:  These costs involve ”key systems, processes and [digital] functions” that provide controls for ensuring complete customer satisfaction. Examples in manufacturing include: test and inspection of purchased material; measuring services; field testing; approval expenditures; process or product evaluation and report; quality information equipment expense; and quality audits.
  4. Prevention:  These costs are obviously associated with preventing quality problems and “the disconnects and backward creep that can affect complete customer satisfaction.” Examples in manufacturing include quality and reliability; analysis and planning; quality training and manpower development; and specification, design and development of quality information equipment.

After the business failure costs have been identified, quality leaders can then begin an action plan to measure and manage those costs. “Each individual company must define the specific measurement areas within the business failure cost structure that best fits its own business requirements. For example, internal failure costs in the manufacturing industry might include scrap and rework.”

Feigenbaum says that companies must realize they can’t rely on market growth alone.  “What they can control, however, is how effectively their processes create results.”

“Achieving those results starts with a strong and effective focus on managing systematic measurement.”

“Often, the end product is the elimination of a significant proportion of failure costs and [increased] sales revenue.”

About DataNet Quality Systems

DataNet Quality Systems empowers manufacturers to improve products, processes, and profitability through real-time statistical software solutions. The company’s vision is to deliver trusted and capable technology solutions that allow manufacturers to create the highest quality product for the lowest possible cost. DataNet’s flagship product, WinSPC, provides statistical decision-making at the point of production and delivers real-time, actionable information to where it is needed most. With over 2500 customers worldwide and distributors across the globe, DataNet is dedicated to delivering a high level of customer service and support, shop-floor expertise, and training in the areas of Continuous Improvement, Six Sigma, and Lean Manufacturing services.

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.