Skip to main content
Advantive

Managing Reverse BOMs and One-to-Many Manufacturing Processes

By Grace Barton Updated

Most manufacturing processes begin with a Bill of Materials (BOM), from bicycles to swing-sets, tires to airplanes. Financial tools and the more robust ERPs are designed with these kinds of BOMs in mind: many individual pieces go in, and one finished good comes out. This is great for operations who specialize in discreet manufacturing, but this approach falls short when it comes to managing reverse BOMs.

So, what is a Reverse BOM?

If you have a Reverse Bill of Materials or deal with one-to-many processes in your manufacturing, you know already. It’s the exact opposite of what most manufacturing or WMS software is built to manage. It’s taking one item, and then using it to make many things. While every manufacturing industry runs against this challenge here and there, in many food manufacturing and food processing verticals, Reverse BOMs are the norm. In fact, over 40% of all ParityFactory WMS clients utilize Reverse BOMs.

While not limited to these verticals, most produce processors as well as the majority of our protein clients fall into this category. Whether processing apples into various sizes and grade, and fresh sliced and dried sliced and puree, it’s one apple becoming several finished goods. Protein clients, from beef to seafood to poultry are in the same boat. Beyond those, even other food verticals run into it from a consolidated WIP step, such as dividing a single tray of tofu into a variety of uses.

This presents a unique challenge, because ERPs systems weren’t built with food in mind and certainly weren’t built for Reverse BOMs or one-to-many processes. The main reason is the history behind some of these tools (i.e., they were designed for making bicycles), many of which are dated in technology terms. The other issue is that Reverse BOMs are more difficult problem, particularly when it comes to costing. For example, if you process a ten-dollar whole salmon, and produce twenty-dollars of row, ten dollars of filet, and one dollar of trim, how do you divide the cost of the original fish against those outputs? (The answer is, there are many ways from weight, to finished good value, to a fixed ratio—but the right path differs per operation.)

One of the core reasons ParityFactory WMS was designed as a stand-alone WMS—integrated with ERPs like QuickBooks, NetSuite, Intacct and Microsoft, but not a built in them—is so we could solve this exact problem.

ParityFactory tracks the input goods by lot (tote of blueberries, bin of walnuts, full carcass or case primals, etc.) and marry back the finished goods that result from processing those input lots—regardless of the variety of finished goods. What this means is ParityFactory can report back on the yields of that production run, both in terms of weight and units. (ParityFactory also supports numerous cut sheets to give direction on how to process proteins, depending on outstanding sales orders, etc).

The reality is that ERPs do a terrible job of managing Reverse BOMs. Similarly, so do WMS packages. So many of our customer had given up on the idea of implementing a WMS because these aren’t supported or, even worse, they only found out once they’d bought it that Reverse BOMs weren’t supported.

At ParityFactory, we do food only. And to say that, you have to be able to manage One-to-Many Processes and Reverse BOMs. Reach out to schedule your demo today and we’ll show you how ParityFactory WMS can take the work out of managing your reverse BOMs.

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.