Skip to main content
Advantive

How do I know what process characteristics to control?

By Grace Barton Updated
How do I know what process characteristics to control?

While the construction of control charts is relatively straightforward, often a more difficult question is: how do I know what process characteristics to control in the first place?

Clearly, controlling everything is not feasible or a smart use of limited resources. In an earlier Ask the Expert topic, we discussed the philosophy of process control as opposed to inspection (or product control). There we stressed that process control is most beneficial when we move upstream in the process.

When the significant process variables that affect a key process output are being controlled, then the process output is predictable. Costly (and imperfect) inspection may be eliminated.

So the questions now become:
– What are key process output variables?
– What are key process input variables?
– How are key process input variables identified?

What are key process output variables?

WinSPC Means Lower Costs and Higher Quality

WinSPC is software to help manufacturers create the highest quality product for the lowest possible cost. You can learn more here.

Key process output variables (sometimes referred to as Key Characteristics) are traits or features of a part, piece of material, assembly, subsystem, or system whose variation has a significant influence on fit, performance, reliability, manufacturability, or assembly. In short, they are characteristics that have a big impact on efficiency and/or customer satisfaction. Variation in key process output variables leads to lower levels of quality and reliability and, ultimately, higher costs.

Examples of key process output variables are:
– Slip torque of an actuator
– Gap between car body and rear quarter glass panel
– Cabin wind noise
– Fill volume for a bottled beverage

What are key process input variables?

Key process input variables are process inputs that have a significant impact on the variation found in a key process output variable. That is, if the key process input variables were controlled (e.g. held constant), the process would produce predictable and consistent outputs.

For example, if the flatness of a clutch disk has a significant impact on the slip torque of an actuator, then clutch disk flatness would be a key process input variable.

As another example, my wife likes to experiment with baking the healthiest cookies possible by substituting fat free yogurt for butter. Clearly, the absence of butter has a large impact on the consistency and taste of the cookies. By finding an acceptable butter/yogurt mix and then holding this key process input variable constant, I should expect consistent cookie consistency!

How are key process input variables identified?

Since we have limited resources, the challenge is determining which variables are important enough to control. While considerable effort is spent on trial-and-error approaches, these are extremely inefficient and almost never result in optimal solutions.

Fortunately, a tool exists that is perfect for this problem. Design of Experiments (DOE) is a tool that allows us to conduct structured experimentation to efficiently model process behavior and understand the cause-and-effect relationships present. Many types of experiments are available and their appropriate use depends on the experiment objectives, the number of factors to be investigated, the types of factors, etc.

Most products and processes must satisfy multiple customer requirements (and so there are multiple key process output variables). For example, a part may need to possess a specific strength and flexibility. Often, optimizing one performance metric will degrade another. DOE can be used to jointly optimize systems where multiple objectives are present–that is, find the sweet spot.

Rigorous use of DOE is invaluable in determining not only which input variables must be controlled to produce consistent outputs but to what extent those variables must be controlled. That is, we may quantify the sensitivity of the output variable to changes in the input variable. And this is exactly the information that is needed to deploy effective control charts.

Steven Wachs, Principal Statistician
Integral Concepts, Inc.

Integral Concepts provides consulting services and training in the application of quantitative methods to understand, predict, and optimize product designs, manufacturing operations, and product reliability. www.integral-concepts.com

 Download the white paper on how to jump-start a “mini” Six Sigma Quality program on a budget

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.