Skip to main content
Advantive

Best Practices – Labeling Goods Received

By Grace Barton Updated

Labeling goods received is an integral starting point for lot tracing capability.  A question that often arises is, “Should I scan my vendor labels?” The correct answer varies based on a few key considerations.

1. Are your vendor labels usable?

Do your vendors label product with GS1 labels? Do you receive catch (random) weight products? If so, you may be able to save the time and money associated with printing and affixing your own labels by using existing vendor labels. A GS1 label will provide key product information and will eliminate the need to manually input data like weight and lot number. Eliminating data entry not only saves you time and money, but will eliminate human error associated with manual systems.

If your vendor doesn’t label with GS1, you may approach them about changing their labeling practices to better suit your needs.

2.  How many vendors do you have?

If you have many vendors shipping products to your plant, you may find it difficult and labor-intensive to keep track of the different label styles and locations. Each label looks different, has different information encoded, and may be located in different places on the packaging. This can slow down the receiving process and make it difficult to train employees. If feasible, issuing labeling standards to associated vendors may help streamline the process.

Approaching several vendors with the possibility of label changes can be a difficult and slow process; sometimes it’s impossible to get them all on board with changes in a timely manner. In this case, you may want to consider printing labels in-house so each label has all the information you need, is easily recognizable, and is located in the same predictable spot on packaging.

Creating your own label will allow you to highlight the information that is most important in your operation, make it easier to train employees, and speed up label scanning as product moves through the plant.

Creating your own labels can have some drawbacks. Time and cost associated with the internal label process must be considered. In addition, pertinent information like lot code and expiration date would need to be keyed in, opening up the process to manual errors.

There are many factors to consider in determining an ideal labeling strategy. The professionals at ParityFactory can help walk you through the process. Contact us if you have any questions, we’d love to help!

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.