Skip to main content
Advantive

A Quick Guide to Variables and Attributes Data

By Grace Barton Updated
A Quick Guide to Variables and Attributes Data

Variables data is data that is acquired through measurements. This can be length, elapsed time, diameter, strength, weight, temperature, density, thickness, pressure, or height. Accuracy can be measured, for example, to the nearest inch, centimeter, millimeter, or micron.

Attributes data is data that can be classified and counted. In attributes data, key concepts are “nonconformities” and “nonconforming.” There are two types of attributes data: counts of defects per item or group of items (nonconformities) and counts of defective items (nonconforming).

  • Nonconforming data is a count of defective units. It is often described as go/no go, pass/fail, or yes/no since there are only two possible outcomes to any given check. It is also referred to as a count of defective or rejected units. For example, a light bulb either works or, it does not. Track either the number failing or the number passing.
  • Nonconformities data is a count of defects per unit or group of units. Nonconformities can refer to defects or occurrences that should not be present but are. It also refers to any characteristic that should be present but is not. Examples of nonconformities are dents, scratches, bubbles, cracks, and missing buttons.

How are they used?

Variables data is normally analyzed in pairs of charts that present data in terms of location or central location and spread. Location, usually the top chart, shows data in relation to the process average. It is presented in X-bar, individuals, or median charts. Spread, usually the bottom chart, looks at piece-by-piece variation. Range, sigma, and moving range charts are used to illustrate process spread. Another aspect of these variables control charts is that the sample size is generally constant.

Examples: window size, closing time, tire pressure, glass thickness, daily weight gain/loss.

Attributes data is analyzed in control charts that show how a system changes over time. There are two chart options for each type of attributes data.

  • Nonconforming data is analyzed in p-charts and np-charts. Chart selection is based on the consistency of the subgroup size:
    • If the number inspected is always the same, use an np-chart.
    • If the number inspected varies with each subgroup use a p-chart.
  • Nonconformities data is analyzed in u-charts and c-charts. Chart selection is based on the consistency of the subgroup size:
    • If the number of nonconformities is counted, use a c-chart.
    • If the number inspected varies with each subgroup, use a u-chart.

Examples: errors on a math test; invoice problems (nonconformities); broken or missing parts; numbers of employees absent; broken glass products (nonconforming).

Grace Barton

Marketing Specialist

About the Author Latest Posts

Grace Barton is a digital marketing and competitive intelligence professional who crafts strategic narratives by bridging marketing insights with analytical expertise. At Advantive, she creates engaging, data-driven content tailored to the distribution, manufacturing, packaging, and quality industries. Her goal is to deliver impactful messaging that drives engagement and growth based on specific gap closure needs, whether responding to sales organization requirements, pinpointing gaps in content, or meeting immediate market trends.
She thrives on transforming competitive intelligence into actionable insights for the sales organization. Grace manages Advantive’s competitive intelligence platform, Klue, to equip the sales team with the battlecards and market data they need to stay ahead of competitors. Since launch, she’s built 28+ battlecards across four lines of business, ensuring the GTM strategy stays sharp.
Grace has a passion for leveraging market insights with storytelling to guide strategic decision-making, empower sales organizations, and nurture organizational growth.

Areas of Expertise: Digital Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic Narratives, Marketing Insights, Analytical Expertise

LinkedIn

Editorial standards

Fact-checking & editorial guidelines

Every article on advantive.com is written and reviewed against an internal accuracy standard before publication. Here's what that means in practice.

  • Product claims are verified by the brand team that owns the platform.

    When an article references InfinityQS, WinSPC, PQ Systems, Pinpoint, ParityFactory, ProPlanner, KiwiPlan, DDI System, VeraCore, or any of Advantive's other specialty platforms, the relevant product team checks technical statements about features, deployment, and current capability before the article goes live.

  • External statistics cite their source inline.

    When an article references industry survey results, regulatory benchmarks, or third-party research, the source is linked at the point of citation. Statements without an inline source link are first-party observations drawn from Advantive's product teams or customer base.

  • Publication and revision dates stay visible.

    The original publication date and the most recent revision date are both shown on every article. Topics that change quickly — AI capabilities, regulatory rules, product roadmaps — are revisited on a tighter cadence than evergreen reference content.

  • Corrections are issued openly.

    If a factual error is reported, the article is updated, the revision date advances, and material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article so readers can see what changed and when.

Found something wrong, or have a citation to add? Get in touch with the editorial team and we'll review it.

Subject-matter review

Reviewed by subject-matter experts

Advantive is a portfolio of 14+ specialty software platforms — each one built and maintained by a product team that has spent years inside a specific manufacturing or distribution discipline. Articles in technical channels are reviewed by the relevant team before publication.

  • Quality & SPC content

    Reviewed by the InfinityQS, WinSPC, and PQ Systems product teams — the platforms behind statistical process control, capability analysis, and gage management deployments across food, automotive, pharma, and CPG manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing operations & MES content

    Reviewed by the PINpoint, ProPlanner, ParityFactory, and VIA Information Tools teams, whose platforms run production scheduling, traceability, and shop-floor execution for discrete, automotive, and food-and-beverage manufacturers.

  • Packaging & converter content

    Reviewed by the KiwiPlan, Abaca, and AdvantZware teams, who build software specifically for corrugated, folding-carton, and packaging-converter operations.

  • Distribution, ERP & B2B commerce content

    Reviewed by the DDI System (inFORM ERP), Distribution One, VeraCore, Pepperi, and Commerce Vision teams, whose platforms run wholesale ERP, fulfillment, field sales, and B2B portals for specialty distributors and 3PLs.

Are you a practitioner with domain expertise to contribute? Get in touch — we accept guest contributions from operators in the industries we serve.